kkritsilas
Well-Known Member
B-58 had a number of ideas, including the entire bomb bay/extra fuel tank under the belly that could be jettisoned when required. Fast as all get out, even by today's standards. The XB-70, as far as I can recall, is/was, the only Mach 3 bomber, and used a shockwave riding idea to get there. The B-58 was the only supersonic bomber on the US side, the USSR/Russians had the TU-22. Neither were heavy bombers in the B-52 sense. The US then brought out the B-1A (originally supersonic, then cost reduced to subsonic), the Russians brought out the Backfire and Blackjack bombers.
No Peter-pulling required, and I am not trying to convince anybody of anything, just stating opinions. I don't expect to change anybody's opinion in either direction, nor do I really care all that much if anybody agrees with me or not. You like digital dashes, great; somebody likes analog, just as great.
No argument about accuracy in any way. However, knowing whether you are doing 55 or 56 really isn't required most of the time. I like analog gauges just because I feel it allows me to read them faster, and keep my eyes on the road. You may favour accuracy. So be it.
Kostas
P.S. Another plane that seems to be almost forgotten, yet had stellar performance, is the A-5 Vigilante. Sort of the US Navy equivalent.
No Peter-pulling required, and I am not trying to convince anybody of anything, just stating opinions. I don't expect to change anybody's opinion in either direction, nor do I really care all that much if anybody agrees with me or not. You like digital dashes, great; somebody likes analog, just as great.
No argument about accuracy in any way. However, knowing whether you are doing 55 or 56 really isn't required most of the time. I like analog gauges just because I feel it allows me to read them faster, and keep my eyes on the road. You may favour accuracy. So be it.
Kostas
P.S. Another plane that seems to be almost forgotten, yet had stellar performance, is the A-5 Vigilante. Sort of the US Navy equivalent.