Just picked up an 8 1/4 out of a Jeep

BudW

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
5,121
Reaction score
1,486
Location
Oklahoma City
Outstanding!

Chrysler went to the 2.21:1 ratio gears for fuel mileage and for emissions.
In a perfect world, I can see fuel mileage going up on an engine that doesn’t have to spin as much.
In the real world – it doesn’t work that way. Torque multiplication is lost with the high gear ratio and engine is constantly working hard to “maintain” which puts carburetor in the “power” mode full time (or under-load circuit).

The basic systems to every carburetor are: float (fuel level), idle, off-idle, main (primary venturi’s), power/load and accelerator pump. Then some have additional circuits if it has a 4-bbl.

As MoparKidD-4 has demonstrated, getting rid of the 2.2 ratio gears is the first step if you want any sort of power. BTW, thank you for your report.

I think it is odd that police cars almost always come with 2.94 gears. They get the same fuel mileage as 2.2’s and are a lot easier to drive – but factory kept installing the 2.2’s for the masses.


Now I have a couple of questions for you: What did you use for a propeller shaft?
The propeller shaft for an 8¼” is shorter than a 7¼” differential is (1.6”).
A vibration is normally caused by loose U-joints 9 out of 10 times – but if propeller shaft has been removed recently – a ding or dent in it can also cause a vibration,
If a driveshaft shop shortened a propeller shaft, they will balance it afterwards.

If car has new U-Joints and shaft was balanced (and not damaged) – then the most likely cause is tires (balance or defect in tire). There should not (ever) be a vibration present when everything is done.


M-bodies do weigh in at, or about, 4000 pounds.


On the 4-bbl changeover – you have a lot of choices (carburetor brand, square vs. spread bore, intake brand, fuel injection, and so forth. One thing that is hard (or not cheap, depending on how you look at it) to find is the transmission kickdown linkage setup.

I like and prefer the mechanical linkage – but with current prices, availability and the chances of getting a complete (and correct) set is not easy. I’ve seen a lot of people purchase a “so called set” and end up with another 2-bbl setup - or a lot pieces of a mismatched set. I recommend that you get a cable setup. It will be cheaper and that way you don’t have to worry about getting incorrect parts.
If transmission linkage is not used or is not set up correctly – you WILL have premature transmission failure (this is not an if, or a maybe, but a WILL HAVE).

The next item will be air cleaner. If car is to be driven in town and highway every once in a blue moon, and you live in South California, South Texas or Florida (ie: a warm area), what you use for air cleaner won’t matter much.
If you will be doing much highway driving, then getting an air cleaner with fresh air will help your fuel mileage out, at lot.
If you will be driving in below freezing wearer often (like in Ft. Collins, CO), then an air cleaner with exhaust manifold heated air is also beneficial to have.

An air cleaner like this one would fit the bill, nicely http://www.forfmjbodiesonly.com/classicmopar/threads/lean-burn-air-cleaner.6601/ Either use your computer or get a piece of steel to fill the hole on side of air cleaner (it doesn’t need to be a professional job – unless you have plans on entering into a car show).

Once you pick what intake manifold you are going to use, let me know. I have a couple of used ones for sale, cheap (I keep tripping over them in my garage). I just don’t want to recommend which one for you to use.

If you have some extra money in your pocket – you might want to at least look at fuel injection. I have plans on injecting both of my cars – but my money tree is just not putting out enough, nowadays.

One last question (in regards to future 4-bbl changeover). Can you measure your diameter of exhaust pipes for me (after main cat and also the tailpipe (one that exits the car)), please?
BudW
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Outstanding!

Chrysler went to the 2.21:1 ratio gears for fuel mileage and for emissions.
In a perfect world, I can see fuel mileage going up on an engine that doesn’t have to spin as much.
In the real world – it doesn’t work that way. Torque multiplication is lost with the high gear ratio and engine is constantly working hard to “maintain” which puts carburetor in the “power” mode full time (or under-load circuit).

The basic systems to every carburetor are: float (fuel level), idle, off-idle, main (primary venturi’s), power/load and accelerator pump. Then some have additional circuits if it has a 4-bbl.

As MoparKidD-4 has demonstrated, getting rid of the 2.2 ratio gears is the first step if you want any sort of power. BTW, thank you for your report.

I think it is odd that police cars almost always come with 2.94 gears. They get the same fuel mileage as 2.2’s and are a lot easier to drive – but factory kept installing the 2.2’s for the masses.


Now I have a couple of questions for you: What did you use for a propeller shaft?
The propeller shaft for an 8¼” is shorter than a 7¼” differential is (1.6”).
A vibration is normally caused by loose U-joints 9 out of 10 times – but if propeller shaft has been removed recently – a ding or dent in it can also cause a vibration,
If a driveshaft shop shortened a propeller shaft, they will balance it afterwards.

If car has new U-Joints and shaft was balanced (and not damaged) – then the most likely cause is tires (balance or defect in tire). There should not (ever) be a vibration present when everything is done.


M-bodies do weigh in at, or about, 4000 pounds.


On the 4-bbl changeover – you have a lot of choices (carburetor brand, square vs. spread bore, intake brand, fuel injection, and so forth. One thing that is hard (or not cheap, depending on how you look at it) to find is the transmission kickdown linkage setup.

I like and prefer the mechanical linkage – but with current prices, availability and the chances of getting a complete (and correct) set is not easy. I’ve seen a lot of people purchase a “so called set” and end up with another 2-bbl setup - or a lot pieces of a mismatched set. I recommend that you get a cable setup. It will be cheaper and that way you don’t have to worry about getting incorrect parts.
If transmission linkage is not used or is not set up correctly – you WILL have premature transmission failure (this is not an if, or a maybe, but a WILL HAVE).

The next item will be air cleaner. If car is to be driven in town and highway every once in a blue moon, and you live in South California, South Texas or Florida (ie: a warm area), what you use for air cleaner won’t matter much.
If you will be doing much highway driving, then getting an air cleaner with fresh air will help your fuel mileage out, at lot.
If you will be driving in below freezing wearer often (like in Ft. Collins, CO), then an air cleaner with exhaust manifold heated air is also beneficial to have.

An air cleaner like this one would fit the bill, nicely http://www.forfmjbodiesonly.com/classicmopar/threads/lean-burn-air-cleaner.6601/ Either use your computer or get a piece of steel to fill the hole on side of air cleaner (it doesn’t need to be a professional job – unless you have plans on entering into a car show).

Once you pick what intake manifold you are going to use, let me know. I have a couple of used ones for sale, cheap (I keep tripping over them in my garage). I just don’t want to recommend which one for you to use.

If you have some extra money in your pocket – you might want to at least look at fuel injection. I have plans on injecting both of my cars – but my money tree is just not putting out enough, nowadays.

One last question (in regards to future 4-bbl changeover). Can you measure your diameter of exhaust pipes for me (after main cat and also the tailpipe (one that exits the car)), please?
BudW

To answer the first question, the stock driveshaft definitely would not fit; I was ready to swap in the driveshaft from my Duster as that was 1-2" shorter but I have a 7260 to 7290 adapter-style u-joint on that one. So I bit the bullet and had a driveshaft shop shorten and balance the stock one 1.5" and also install new u-joints. The front yoke did move back a tad still but no more than 1/8" from where it was before.

As far as exhaust, I made my own duals setup with 2" downpipes off the stock manifolds going to 2 1/4" pipes from about the firewall back with a pair of Dynomax Ultra-Flo mufflers, they are actually located under the rear seat for more ground clearance and the "tailpipes" make a 180* turn forwards and then out the sides, kind of like the old AAR Cudas and T/A Challengers but without the restrictive mufflers. No H or X-pipe crossover, and no cats until I need to put them in for another emissions test in about 18 months lol...

Kind of a bummer about the intake manifolds for the 4-bbl swap I just bid and won an eBay auction for an Edelbrock Performer (not RPM), $175 including shipping but I would have rather gotten one locally or from a forum member. For a carb I have a ThermoQuad I rebuilt with a kit and a few cores for next to nothing, I'll see how well that runs if it doesn't work the way I hope I'll look for a good used 500-600cfm Carter or Edelbrock, there are a good few to find on Craigslist locally that I can check out in person to make sure I'm not getting junk which is very common...

For air cleaners, I have a nice big 14x3" open element (and multiple-depth-bases to try) I'll use initially but ultimately I want to get a factory-style dual-snorkel air cleaner with the heat riser diverter and route air intake pipes to the front fenders for fresh cold air; best of both worlds...
 

BudW

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
5,121
Reaction score
1,486
Location
Oklahoma City
Good to hear about your propeller shaft.

The next time you get under the car, grab a hold of the propeller shaft (cold – and not when it’s hot) just behind the front U-joint and just in front of the rear U-joint, and feel for any up/down or side to side play. There shouldn’t be any noticeable.
I suspect either the slip yoke and/or its bushing inside of transmission is worn/loose. Any play there can cause a vibration as well as cause the rear transmission seal to leak.
If there is play in the rear side, then something didn’t get set up correctly with the differential and that problem needs to be fixed very soon (or it can get costly).

I have no problem with the 7260 to 7290 U-joints and have used them before – but it is best to get both sides of joints (front to rear as well as both sides of both joints) to be the same for propeller shaft harmonics/movement and for U-joint wear.
That said, I do prefer the 7290 U-joints front and rear (they are stronger and are easier to grease when due).
FMJ’s never did come with the bigger 7290 U-joints.


Personally, I like the Edelbrock Performer intake. No experience on the RPM version, yet.
For use on a 318 – no action is needed. That intake is actually a 340/360 intake design that is factory modified (by Edelbrock) to work with the smaller 318 ports. I used one on my 340 without any problem at all.

When you get the intake in, turn it up on its side and feel the inside of the intake ports. You will notice a taper on intake ports close to the intake gasket area where they taper inwards (smaller). The taper gets close to the smaller 318 runner size (not quite but fairly close).

To use this intake on a 340/360 or a police 318, a person needs to remove that taper and presto, it now works great for the larger port size cylinder heads. Sanding wheels or grinder wheels on a dermal or handheld air grinder will make quick work of those cast-in tapers.

The tapers are not noticeable to 318 performance – which I have found or noticed.
Slapping a 340/360 intake on a small port 318 – there is a noticeable performance because of the step difference.


Can you get me the TQ model number and date code (on rear lower corner of carburetor, closest to driver’s seat), please?
There are 3 different levels of TQ’s out there: Great/outstanding, OK/will get the job done, and the 3rd level is mediocre at best (which unfortunately is the one that most FMJ’s got).

I’m only trying to prevent you spending time and money on a carburetor that will not be to your liking (if you got a unit from the 3rd level group of TQ’s, that is). The first two levels do most people great – just as long as you know what their little quirks are (note: all carburetors have their little quirks and each one are different).
BudW
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
The carb I have is number 9097S, according to the TQ Guide on the web it's originally for a '76 400 with Lean-Burn... However I swapped the top and middle sections from a 9023S carb ('74 440 w/o LB) and used the smallest jets and biggest metering rods I could find between those two carbs and a 9327S which is one for an '83 360 in a truck. Why did I swap parts which is generally a bad idea with different-model TQ's? Well the 9327S didn't run well when I tried it on another 318 years ago and it has a bunch of emissions crap on it. 9023S carb had a badly worn base plate (throttle shafts) and had a terrible off-idle stumble in the car we had it on ('72 Dodge Polara with a 440). The 9097S I got for next to nothing when I sold a Performer 440 intake, it had nice tight throttle shafts and the base plate cleaned up nicely but the upper 2/3rds of the carb wasn't in great shape. So I took the top two sections from the 9023, the jets and metering rods from the 9327 (after measuring them with a .001"-increment dial caliper), and put them on the 9097 base plate; they fit up fine btw, no mismatches on the gaskets and whatnot. Hence the "we'll see how it runs" attitude... lol
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Actually it might not work after all, I just noticed the 9097 base plate has no vacuum advance port due to the Lean-Burn system... DANG! lol guess I'm looking for a small Carter/Edelbrock now
 

BudW

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
5,121
Reaction score
1,486
Location
Oklahoma City
The 9023s came off of a late ’74 C-body with 440 and automatic transmission 49-state. It does have the large primaries. This one ranks 3-stars and is one of the “outstanding” TQ’s.

The 9097s came off of late ’76 B or C-body 400 Automatic transmission 49-state. It does have the large primaries and is Lean Burn. I happen to have a couple of these and this carburetor does rank 1-star (the bottom level of the TQ world).

The 9327s came off of a ’83 pickup 360 (either transmission type) 49-state. It does have the small primaries. This one ranks 2-stars (not at the top rung but is better than the 9097s you have).


---
I need to check my records – but the base place “might” interchange between the 9023s and 9097s. The bodies and tops WILL NOT.

The base and body on the 9327s is smaller and will not physically fit onto the other two. The top might fit either – but I doubt it.

Basically, you have to place the large primary and small primary TQ’s in completely different columns for part interchange. Jets, rods and other small parts will interchange without any issue, for the most part.

Then, you have to split the two different columns into the 3 different "star" categories - for major part replacements (in effect making 6 groups of the same carburetor that has very little (but some) interchange).

The 3-star TQ’s will fit on and work outstanding for pretty much anything out there.
The 2-star TQ’s will fit and run OK on a lot out there – but your “mileage” (a very loose term - in this case) may vary.
The 1-star TQ’s I would use for parts (ie: jets, rods and the such) for they will (for the most part) run OK on a good day, but all-in-all won’t make the owners happy.


If you still have the 9023s. I would take the base to a carburetor rebuilder (might have to ship it somewhere) to get rebuilt and reuse it, if at all possible. It won’t cost as much as you think.
Now with that said, the butterflies have staked screws in them – which is hard for us hobbyists to get ahold of (for safety reasons). If you try to take those screws out yourself – you WILL mess things up (and I have a lot of experience on that aspect). Take my word and just get it done somewhere. You will be happier (and saner).

If you don’t know which parts fit which, then send me a PM with what your casting part numbers are and I can look it up for you.

Also – please do not get a carburetor from a parts store (read my earlier posts about carburetor rebuilders). If you are to get a carburetor rebuilt, get a shop who will rebuild “yours”. That way – no parts mismatch will occur.
BudW
 

BudW

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
5,121
Reaction score
1,486
Location
Oklahoma City
Actually it might not work after all, I just noticed the 9097 base plate has no vacuum advance port due to the Lean-Burn system... DANG! lol guess I'm looking for a small Carter/Edelbrock now
That part can be fixed with a drill, a steady drill hand and a small piece of pipe/tubing.


Also, note: the Lean Burn still has a type of vacuum advance – but indirectly.
The hose that would normally come from that fitting, goes to the computer vacuum sensor - on the early ones. The later ones used manifold vacuum.
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Nice, so my "Frankenstein" TQ isn't trash then lol. Where could I find the small tubing to make the ported vacuum fitting? A hobby store (like for R/C vehicles, models etc.)? I found a pretty nice Edelbrock Thunder AVS 500 cfm not too far from me on CL for $200, it's a manual choke model though which means I'd have to rig up a choke cable. Still it would be nice to just spend a few bucks in comparison and make this TQ work, a lot more satisfying as well as I have yet to have success messing with ThermoQuads and actually make them run right.
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
So I just took the carb apart again and noticed a ported vacuum chamber (was drilled into the throttle bores above the throttle plates at idle) going to a larger fitting on the front side of the base plate, according to the web it's supposed to be for venting the charcoal canister but I'll just use an adapter for the vacuum advance line from the distributor. Then an adapter for the charcoal canister line going to the fitting on the side of the main body meant for some EGR line, which will be deleted with the intake swap anyway.

Should still pass emissions with a brand-new pair of aftermarket cats and a good tune using a wideband O2 setup.........? lol at least I don't have to worry about it for 18 months or so
 

kkritsilas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
420
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
The vacuum port that you are talking about may be manifold vacuum, not ported vacuum. It can possibly be made to work, but you may have idle issues.
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
The vacuum port that you are talking about may be manifold vacuum, not ported vacuum. It can possibly be made to work, but you may have idle issues.

Well the passages definitely go above the throttle blades, and I know with charcoal canisters the vacuum has to be from a ported source because it's basically a constant air leak; charcoal canisters don't hold any vacuum themselves.
 

8v-of-fury

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
433
Reaction score
39
Location
Orillia, Ontario
Just run it on manifold vacuum why don't ya? Up until recently I've had my (basically exact same combo as you) 318 sitting on 15* initial, and manifold vacuum of 14*. Idling at 29* it was perfect and crisp, and cooooool. Unplug the vacuum, and the idle didn't change at all. So either way it doesn't really matter, as ported pulls that 14* (or w.e you have set) as soon as the throttle cracks open.

I can't see the bother with messing around to make your carb have ported vacuum.
 

MoparKidD-4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
114
Reaction score
19
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Just run it on manifold vacuum why don't ya? Up until recently I've had my (basically exact same combo as you) 318 sitting on 15* initial, and manifold vacuum of 14*. Idling at 29* it was perfect and crisp, and cooooool. Unplug the vacuum, and the idle didn't change at all. So either way it doesn't really matter, as ported pulls that 14* (or w.e you have set) as soon as the throttle cracks open.

I can't see the bother with messing around to make your carb have ported vacuum.

I've messed with manifold vacuum for the distributor before and it made the engine run badly, like hunting up and down a few hundred RPM at idle. I know some Chevies and Fords run manifold vacuum and it works but the old-school Mopar engines have always had ported vacuum advance from the factory, at least before the advance was computerized. I don't need to mess with the carb after all anyway, just need to swap around some hoses and get creative with a couple adapters.

The tricky part is the choke setup, I would like to just have a manual choke since I'm blocking the exhaust crossover when I put the new intake on.
 
Back
Top