My friend has a set for a Camaro with 26" front. Use these with ARE 105 1.5" shorter hangers and bingo! Have to make a driveshaft anyway
Im thinking you might check things really close before you purchase the ARE 105 hangers as they leave just enough room to hang a spring but several factors tell me its going to put the front pivot assembly of the cal track in a bind. But you could possibly trim a bit of the caltrack side plates.
Looking at the pic of the are 105, yes you can get a spring eye to fit but it looks close and the spring eye on the ct spring is pretty big.
Here are some pics with the oem spring hanger mount center at approx 2 3/4 and when adjusted out properly is very close to being in a bind, so taking 1.5 inches off that I think might be a stretch.
During the off season I back off all the tension. The next two pics show it backed off alot, the second pic shows the line where the front pivot assembly sits when adjusted and you can see its pretty close to a binding situation as is.
So im wondering what things will present themselves if it were all moved up 1.5 inches.
Looking more at the are 105 vs the are 109 F hanger you can see the big difference in room.
Ive a street handling setup with a no arch spring a shorter CT segment bar. And a track setup with the CT setup as delivered.
You can see again in the pic where the CT pivot assembly sits at rest and im still thinking if it were 1.5 inches up it would bind.
So it might be worth checking
View attachment 33759
View attachment 33764
Well I had to find out, so I went out and adjusted it just to the spring with no load on the bar and it looks to be dead on 1.5 inches, so if your ARE 105 is a real 1.5 shorter then a oem F. Hmmmm. Check, check, check.
But then again, I read into everything backwards, so your case might be a non issue, but maybe worth checking.