kkritsilas
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't give him grief, but I'd walk on by. Antiques with the ubiquitous small block Chevy don't do it for me. Truthfully, I can go to any show around here and see the same set up. Ford/Dodge/whatever body with a cheap junkyard small block Chevy. But, hey, it's not my car. If he built it for his tastes, then that's all the matters, no matter what the naysayers say.
Damned good engines and can built to run. I'd wager that with the right wrench on it, the proper amount of research it would run circles around a lot of 350's.
If you enter a show and put a car on display, then you're asking for opinions. Basically, what you're saying, is that the only opinions which matter are the ones who are gonna give you an "attaboy!" If you can't handle the negativity with the positive, then you've got a chip on your shoulder about your ride. Again, did you build it to please the masses or did you build it to please yourself? If you built it to please the masses then you have to take the bad with the good. If you built it to please yourself, then no one's opinion of it matters, no matter how much work you've put into it, how well engineered it is.
As someone who used to build cars for a living (and will again), I've had customers cars on the show field quite a bit, either just on display or in it for judging. I've heard the negative things. I've heard the positive things. To all of which I said "thank you." The reality is: if you put your car on display you are going to hear negativity. It's a fact of life. Grow a thicker skin to it or pull the car off display.
But, then again, you're talking to a man who has owned a '69 Sport Satellite 4 door factory 383-4bbl since he was sixteen. If I had a dollar for every nitwit who told me to pull the powertrain out, put it in a 2 door, and clone a Road Runner I'd have had enough money to build the car ten times over twenty years ago. My car, my build, my decisions. I don't have to justify my thought processes to anyone.
See, there's the rub. I don't want to be like the masses with my builds. If the masses are telling me to pull the 239 out of the '54 and replace it with a junkyard 350 because I can build more power on the cheap then why do I want to be like the masses? I've heard the same thing with my F250 for the past 25 years. Put a 460 in it! The fact I can build 450ft/lb of torque at less than 3000rpm, have 5th double over right in the middle of the power band at 70mph with my 300 inline tells me these are the people who's opinion is based solely on what they read in magazines.
And these are the same people who think they can build my car? Yeah, let 'em have their opinions. Let 'em think they can build my ride better than I can. I take it for what it's worth. Let 'em think that way all they want. It won't sway my opinion of what my ride is.
So, he let the ignorant define his ride?
See, that's what I'm talking about. He wasn't prepared to hear someone of a differing opinion. They're going to come crawling out of the wood work, usually by someone who's never done the work, especially to an extent this guy has. Why do you even value such a person's opinion that you let them sway you in your thinking of what you've done?
Newsflash. The so-called purists aren't the only ones out there. The true "purist" wouldn't be criticizing your buddy for putting a small block Chevy in a Merc, they'd be criticizing himself for not leaving the flathead in place. A "purist" wouldn't be criticizing a home built car for not having a Mustang suspension, a true "purist" wouldn't have anything to do with the car. A true "purist" wouldn't turn his nose up at your J-bod for not having a B or RB because he'd know the J-bodies weren't offered with one.
These people aren't "purists," they're elitists. They think only their opinions matter and are willing to voice it until the cows come home. Why would you let someone like that have any sway over any part of your life, much less over your ride of choice and the decisions you make for your ride? Let 'em have their opinions. They'll have one anyway, rather you like it or not. The only opinion that matters is your own.
The 350 is not a junkyard cast off. It is a mildly built (350-380 HP) 350. That originally had a 3 speed TH350 on it. Owner felt it was running too high an RPM at freeway speeds, so he swapped it out for a 700R4. I really would like to see a 350-400 HP flathead, i'd like to know how that is done. From what I know, and I am no expert on flat heads (I've only seen two in my life, and they were both stock, one was in a rusted out Model A, as a small kid, and one other that the Mercury owner is restoring for an owner of a just after post war 1 ton Farm truck). I just figured there was a reason Ford went away from the flat head. but maybe they were wrong. All the guy wanted was a good, reliable ride that had some get up and go, and was easy to maintain. I don't know where you live, but flat head Ford parts (plugs, filters, etc.) are not easy to find up here. As for it "doing it for you", it doesn't matter. It wasn't done to "do it for you" or anybody else, it was done to fit the purposes of the owner. If "doing it for you" involves hauling around a close to 4000 lb. car with a 90 HP flathead, or maybe 200 HP flathead at best, then build one on your own. The owner gets a lot of enjoyment out of his car. He made his choices based on what he wanted his car to do. The owner is far more than capable of building or rebuilding any sort of engine/transmission combination that he wanted to. He is well aware of all manufacturers engines, choosing to use a Chev. 350/700R5 for ease of maintenance due to his using the car as a daily driver, not a trailer queen.
You are putting it all out there when you display your car. You will get some jeers along with the cheers. But in the case of the person commenting on the Bugatti replica (by the way, the guy designed and built it from photographs) was out of line. He was dismissive of the 5 years of effort the guy put in. I'm sure corner carving wasn't on the top of his list. If nothing else, he should have respected the person's workmanship and effort. Over and above all of that, he was wrong. The Panther chassis under the Crown Vic is better for handling than the Mustang chassis (of the time) was. It is an IRS chassis, and in the police form, is about as solid a chassis as you can get from a factory car. The criticism was not made on technical grounds, but to put the guy's efforts down, and to be a condescending p***k, He was a Mustang owner, so his car was best. Doesn't really matter if it was true or not, as long as he could trash talk somebody else's efforts in an effort to make himself and his choice of car superior.
As far as the "purists" out there (note the use of the quotes), somebody needs to teach them some manners. Talk choices, talk techniques of doing thing. Do not put people who have put in hundreds to thousands of hours of time and effort to bring their dreams to life. You may not agree with their dreams, which is fine, becasue everybody has their own dream (or concept of what they see as the ideal car). My dreams may not be your dreams, this is why they are MY dreams. Don't h ave anything good to say, just keep walking. When did it become acceptable for people to walk around putting down others. How insecure are they? I don't like 67-70 Chargers (just way too many of them), but love '66 Chargers. I certainly wouldn't put down any 67-70 Charger, despite my feelings for them.
Kostas
Last edited: