It bugs me when they cast movie cars, even for background, that are all wrong.
I agree there.
I can understand why the glass is “super clean” on a car with video / pictures taken within (which makes sense). That said, you see a street scene where a car drives by, and you can tell the car was just detailed – not a spec of dust on the car and you know the car is distracting from the characters or the story.
In real life, most cars are not all “freshly detailed”.
Another thing, even today, you drive around a neighborhood and most cars are in the 3 to 15-year-old range (my opinion, only – not actually measured) with a few newer or older. I have seen some period shows and every car is like 1957 (or there abouts).
It looks more like the movie went to a time period car show and the movie was a sub-plot (or however its worded).
I can understand cars that are needed for inside shots, but at least let the other 90% of vehicles shown have some road dirt, dust, bird bombs, etc., on them.
I also watch to see how often the same cars show up in different locations.
I think the first, or second, Dukes of Hazzard TV episodes, there is a picture of the General Lee going around the town center with cops behind. The camera sits motionless for about 2-3 seconds, after cars departed, before going to next camera location. During that camera shot, you can see another General Lee car (spare?) parked, plain as day (someone goofed . . .).
BudW